The chart shows the information about salt intake in the US in 2000
The bar chart illustrates how much salt being eaten by Americans 20 years ago.
Overall, while both under 6-year-old sexes ate the lower number of salt than that of the recommended adult salt intake, people from six to over 60 consumed at least 2500 milligrams of salt in this year. In addition, male always had a higher salt intake than female in any age group.
As can be seen from the bar chart, the majority of salt being consumed by male in 2000 belonged to the 20-39 aged group, which accounted for over 4500 milligrams. Next came the 12-19 aged men, at approximately 4300 milligrams, which was followed by people from 40 to 60, at around 3900 milligrams. Consequently, the smallest number of salt being eaten by under 6-year-old men was nearly 200 milligrams smaller than the recommended one (2500 milligrams).
Regrading female in the US, the figures for the salt intake of female from 6 to 60 years old were marginal, which were about 3000 milligrams. Also, female, those aged over 60 consumed the same number of salt as that of the recommended salt intake for adults, at exactly 2500 milligrams. Besides, this figure was twice as high as that of the under 6 aged groups, at just over 1300 milligrams.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- Some Governments say how many children a family can have in their country should be strictly controlled They may control the number of children someone has through taxes Is It sometimes necessary and right for a government to control the population in thi 84
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 73
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003 and projections for 2050 73
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, so, while, at least, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72641509434 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56008257365 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528301886792 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9619692734 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.333333333 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191876180638 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089469191214 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585569463131 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125425947941 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310180581833 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.