The provided graph illustrates amount of cell phones and fixed phone lines per 100 people in 7 counties. According to the data Canada, United States of America and Denmark showed majority of land lines although Germany, UK, Sweden and Italy presented opposite effect. It is apparently seen that in named countries in Europe, cell phones market has significantly more users than people who are using phones in their households. However, in Denmark count of mobile phones and land lines has a minimum difference.
In Canada and USA, land lines are number one on the market with about 62 per cent and 68 per cent respectively, whereas cell phones market has only nearly 40 per cent and close to fifty per cent. As presented in the graph, only one European county has more land line users than cell phone users (Denmark, about 88 per cent).
Cell phones market is number one in compared European countries. Getting back to the details, mobile phone market has in Italy ninety per cent while landline slightly exceeding 40 per cent. United Kingdom and Sweden illustrates similar figure as Italy of cell phone users about 85 per cent and nearly ninety per cent respectively.
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 73
- Some people think that men and women have different qualities. Therefore, some certain jobs are suitable for men and some jobs are suitable for women . To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- It is generally discussed among the public that extreme sports such as sky diving and rock climbing should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Motorways help people travel quickly and cover long distances but they also cause problems. What are the problems of motorways and what solutions are there? 89
- The graph shows the number of boys and girls playing sport in an English town in 2012 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, however, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93434343434 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40194395475 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515151515152 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5922016046 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.555555556 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28012199229 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136485102418 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633128937262 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200165914675 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04472866763 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.