The supplied chart depicts data of visit overseas by England people and travels into the UK by tourists, while the second graph shows the most popular destinations visited by UK residents in 1999. Data are shown in millions.
Overall, it is obviously seen from the illustration that people of Britain doubled number of overseas visitors into the UK. Also, France was the most popular destination for British holidaymakers.
Therefore, number of overseas visitors doubled over two decades (about 10 millions in 1979 and roughly 25 millions in 1999), there are not significant increase, however, steady raise is shown. Notwithstanding, overseas visitors did not show any dramatic rise, British citizens traveled five times more in 1999 (about 52 millions) than in 1979 (just above 10 millions).
Getting back to the details, around 11 millions British holidaymakers visited France in 1999, in contrast to least visited destination (Turkey) with approximately 2.5 million tourist in 1999.
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Motorways help people travel quickly and cover long distances but they also cause problems. What are the problems of motorways and what solutions are there? 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage participation of men in senior development in three companies between 1980 and the year 2010. 73
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. 67
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...visitors did not show any dramatic rise, British citizens traveled five times mor...
^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...itizens traveled five times more in 1999 about 52 millions than in 1979 just abov...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, therefore, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45098039216 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85804072233 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.653594771242 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.8681943278 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.142857143 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 5.23603664747 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170469915055 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784686355853 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709883612886 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109213911759 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068465304896 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.