The chart shows participation rates for different lockdown activities in the city of Saigon during 2020.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Contained in the bar chart is data pertaining to the leisure of individuals who live in Saigon city from beginning to end of 2020.
It can be taken from the graph that males had more participants inactivity than females, with exception of cooking, reading, and exercising. It should also be noted that the most popular activity was exercising for both sexes.
Looking at figures for cooking, exercising, and reading books in further detail, it can be seen that the disparities between sexes were noticeable. Regarding cooking, there was shapely 70% female participants, while males accounted for roughly 10% making it the biggest difference. The figures were similar in reference to the participation rates for exercising, where females outnumbered males at around nearly 75% against approximately 15% in that order. The same pattern can be witnessed in reading books, with the figure for females being far higher than another with 72% and under 10%. Additionally, the biggest difference between the percentages of males and females is seen in the activities mentioned.
Turning to the remaining statistics, it is evident that the differences were less substantial. With respect to participation rates for watching tv, a lesser number of males at around 60% participated in it compared to females at 15%. By contrast, there was a dissimilar trend for people partaking in investing. Participation rates for males and females were similar and stood at just over 40%. In reference to people who be self-study, it is apparent that the percentage of males was shapely higher than another at 20% and over 10%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Contained in the bar chart is data perta...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n city from beginning to end of 2020. It can be taken from the graph that male...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 62, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'participants'' or 'participant's'?
Suggestion: participants'; participant's
...aken from the graph that males had more participants inactivity than females, with exception...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tivity was exercising for both sexes. Looking at figures for cooking, exercisi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is seen in the activities mentioned. Turning to the remaining statistics, it ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, regarding, so, while, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 965.302439024 140% => OK
No of words: 259.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20463320463 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95687866476 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 283.868780488 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.2239564196 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.692307692 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07692307692 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150981994331 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607775501105 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376450887105 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0980352929795 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230049301624 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 40.7170731707 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.