The chart shows the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia from 1980 to 2010
The bar chart graphically demonstrates about the proportion of person adult males and women who had been chubby in Australia between 1980 to 2010.
From an overall perspective, it is clear to show off that the share of chubby person men are increased than females, while the determine shows that every genders skilled an upward trend over the periods.
In 1980, 40% of Australian men had been over heavy and it rose barely to about 50% in 1990. Even even though the figures swelled sharply in 2000 of about 65%, it went down modestly to over 60% at the cease of the period.
In contrast, the proportion of women, who had been overweight, had been decrease than males. However, there was as soon as a steep upward jostle in the share of obese females from clearly 30% at the commencing of the period to about 45% in 1990. In 2000, this broad variety was once a sizeable prolong to 50% and then stayed at the equal stage in 2010
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-04 | hi.nguyn91 | view | |
| 2023-01-04 | hi.nguyn91 | view | |
| 2023-01-04 | hi.nguyn91 | view | |
| 2023-01-04 | hi.nguyn91 | view | |
| 2022-10-12 | hi.nguyn91 | 40 | view |
- 123
- Line graph
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 56
- Task2 11
- The graph below give information about computer ownership as percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010 and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...n men are increased than females, while the determine shows that every genders skilled an upw...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 92, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: Even
...nd it rose barely to about 50% in 1990. Even even though the figures swelled sharply in 2...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, then, well, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 763.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.51479289941 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31546256694 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609467455621 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1406592756 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204280565085 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833583335627 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775815362106 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122447791961 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0862267143018 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.