The graph below give information about computer ownership as percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010
The bar charts outline computer ownership as a proportion of the population between 2002 and 2010 and trends of computer ownership by five education level over a period 8 years. All trends exhibit positive growth in both graphs and also albeit different rates.
To begin with, computers were owned by roughly 60% of people in 2002. The next of following year would see a swell to 60% people. After this growth, steadily increase of 3% per year were apparent. Computer ownership hit 63% in 2006, 67% in 2008 and 70% in 2010.
Secondly, although the increase modestly climbed in the education level of Bachelor’s degree and postgraduate qualification, the indicators of computer ownership were higher rather than other levels with 70% and 90% in former and just shade higher 75% and 95% in latter respectively. The change of computer ownership in high school and college were equally with 30% increase in these period. There was the highest growth in no high school diploma level jumped from just shy of 15% to over 40%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-30 | Binhchuduy | 82 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | quan12341234 | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-19 | faztaz | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-03 | HappyCandy | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-03 | HappyCandy | 89 | view |
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
- Line graph 78
- Nowadays many charities and organizations have to publicize their activities by giving a name to a particular day such as National Children s day for encouraging treatment of children National Non smoking Day for encouraging people to give up smoking Why 67
- The chart shows the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia from 1980 to 2010 84
- Line graph
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, secondly, so, well, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94797687861 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59714527005 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624277456647 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 70.1407755522 43.030603864 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1111111111 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289936088457 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109405400696 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108963498537 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203305870521 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0898067036991 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.