The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.
The bar charts illustrate the trend of computer owners in an eight year period and the division of the ownership by qualification on the two endpoints, 2002 and 2010.
Overall, it can be seen that the possession rose steadily each year. However, the variance in percentage for the 2002 and 2010 displays a jump when split up into groups of qualifications. Regarding the year by year trend, ownership gradually increased from roughly 58% to 76%. The bi-yearly difference remains a constant of almost 2% climb.
Looking into the qualifications, it is also a growing course of ownership with increasing qualifications. A staggering 95% and 90% of postgraduate and bachelor's degree holders, respectively, have computers in 2010, a roughly 30% increase from 8 years prior. This percentage is similar to the 85% of those who didn’t complete college. The smallest group of owners are the high school droppers at a mere 12%. However, as is the trend for all levels, there are 30% more in 2010, a similar escalation to the one that points to the number of school graduates.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-30 | Binhchuduy | 82 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | quan12341234 | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-19 | faztaz | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-03 | HappyCandy | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-03 | HappyCandy | 89 | view |
- he charts below show the favourite takeaways of people in Canada and the number of Indian restaurants in Canada between 1960 and 2015 90
- Many people believe that zoos have no purpose in today s world and should be closed What problems do zoos bring What are the alternatives to zoos if they are closed 92
- The chart below gives information about trends in internet use by females in the USA in two years
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans 78
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in Calgary 2000 2010 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, regarding, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 894.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99441340782 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03291762293 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642458100559 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.142080737 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264048441009 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901983741981 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735990708371 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191134670804 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420918438117 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.