he charts below show the favourite takeaways of people in Canada and the number of Indian restaurants in Canada between 1960 and 2015.
The given pie chart illustrates takeaway cuisines most in favour with Canada’s population, while the bar chart demonstrates how many Indian-Canadian restaurants could be found in a 55 year period from 1960 to 2015.
At first glance, it is apparent that Chinese and Indian takeaways are most popular with Canadians. Being one of the favourites, the amount of Indian restaurants are observed to grow throughout the study period.
Regarding favourites, Chinese and Indian cuisines take up most of the chart at 60%, whereas from the remaining, Persian, Italian and those who never order, combined, take up one third of the chart. The other takeaways have minimal favour, with on average 2% of the population voting for each.
Looking into further details, the increase in the number of Indian eateries has been tremendous. From only 500 in 1960 to a striking 9000 fifty-five years later, the multiplication has not always been the same. The jumps that stand out are for the ‘70-’97 period, where in each decade the numbers grow in 2000s, reaching just below 8000 in 3 decades. After which, the expansion of the Indian tastes was gradual with a net addition of only 1000 restaurants in 2 decades.
- The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010 and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010 84
- The chart below gives information about trends in internet use by females in the USA in two years
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summqrise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es, the amount of Indian restaurants are observed to grow throughout the study pe...
^^
Line 7, column 303, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 2000s'.
Suggestion: in the 2000s
..., where in each decade the numbers grow in 2000s, reaching just below 8000 in 3 decades....
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, regarding, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1008.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06532663317 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76463213258 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643216080402 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4982207325 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243933283622 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860946309291 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627176039688 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142431336049 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676626809419 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.