The table below shows how the UK unemployed spent their time last year.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given tabular chart depicts the various activities that took up the time of UK's unemployed in the previous year.
Overall, it can be seen that morning people are more active than those who wake up at noon or later. Housework is by the far the most popular task as a whole whereas job hunting take second place.
Looking into detail of the morning persons, what stands out is that while looking for employment, at 22%, is most popular with morning men, nearly half of women's time is spent performing household chores. This takes precedence to looking for employment, which at 22% men seem to concentrate on more than women at 16%. About one fifth of both gender's time is also given to shopping, which, surprisingly, is roughly the same time as job hunting for men.
On the other hand, afternoon people tend to spend more of their time on leisure activities. TV is most popular with the gents as 14% of last year was spent watching television. Shopping, and visiting friends and relatives is more popular with the women, who spent 17% of their time on each. This is a stark outcry from the early risers, who, in comparison, spent less than three quarters of their time on any of these activities.
- Many people go through life doing work that they hate or have no talent for Why does this happen What are the consequences of this situation 88
- The pie charts below compare the proportion of energy capacity in gigawatts GW in 2015 with the predictions for 2040 74
- Tourism has increased so much over the last 50 years that it is having a mainly negative impact on local inhabitants and the environment However others claim that it is good for the economy Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of tourism and give your 84
- he charts below show the favourite takeaways of people in Canada and the number of Indian restaurants in Canada between 1960 and 2015 67
- The table below shows how the UK unemployed spent their time last year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...usehold chores. This takes precedence to looking for employment, which at 22% men...
^^
Line 7, column 373, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ers, who, in comparison, spent less than three quarters of their time on any of t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, second, so, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67136150235 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4073751362 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610328638498 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9356949221 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14263979862 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624446192636 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492710073002 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0897467202272 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697286891244 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.