Many people go through life doing work that they hate or have no talent for.
Why does this happen? What are the consequences of this situation?
One in every social group, if asked, will not have kind words about their workplace. Many get stuck in roles that they truly despise or cannot seem to get a hang of. In this essay, I will explain what kind of circumstances may lead to this and the resulting consequences.
In this economy, making a living is a job of its own. Knowing this, greater salaries are prioritised by many rather than working in a place they desire. For instance, someone with a passion for saving lives may want to become a Paramedic or Nurse, yet they cannot because jobs like these are highly underpaid word wide. Furthermore, people may prefer wages over salaries, because that would allow overtime work wages. That would lead to an overworked, unfulfilled, and desolate life however. A solution I would suggest would be that there need to be changes in income laws that mitigate this biased and unfair salaries for the common person.
Another reason for anyone finding themselves stuck in the mud, so to say, is not being accepted into their dream college. For many, it is all or nothing and so they end up going in an entirely different direction. Money and funds may be trivial matters for such people, but finding themselves grinding the daily rota without any passion for it, might be a huge problem. A prime example we see quite commonly, is rejected Law School aspirants who instead embark on a different path such as business or education. This is a business on part of Ivy League schools, making admissions tougher every year, and the lower ranked schools trying to compete with them. I reiterate, like above, stand-fast laws need to be present to deal with monopolies and these conscious biases.
In conclusion, it is apparent that doing something you just don’t have knack for, is not the greatest way to live your life. The law makers are as much responsible for this as the common person, for allowing such loopholes and for giving up, respectively. Ultimately, I believe it is the former who yield the power to make this right, and give back hope to the wanting worker.
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in Calgary 2000 2010 89
- The table below shows the results of a 25 year study on the use of bicycles in Britain by age and gender 84
- The diagram below shows a possible future means of home energy production 11
- The pie charts below compare the proportion of energy capacity in gigawatts GW in 2015 with the predictions for 2040 74
- The table below shows how the UK unemployed spent their time last year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun get seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many gets'.
Suggestion: Many gets
... have kind words about their workplace. Many get stuck in roles that they truly despise ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 27, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'finds'.
Suggestion: finds
...n person. Another reason for anyone finding themselves stuck in the mud, so to say,...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76388888889 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51377531972 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1885535498 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2777777778 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72222222222 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243969346758 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722749192951 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497284939509 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147508354264 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423508611714 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.