The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and
make comparisons where relevant.
The supplied two bar graphs depict the percentage of computer belongings in a community. The first graph demonstrates the general computer ownership during an eight-year period from 2002 to 2010. Meanwhile the second graph details the figure more specifically regarding education level in both 2002 and 2010.
The overall trend created by the two sources illustrates an increasing number of people who owned computers due to the timeline and the level of education. Respectively, it can be seen that the latest the year, the higher the percentage of computer ownership and the higher the degree of education, the higher the ownership percentage.
Looking at the detail, the trend shown in the first graph gradually swelled from about 50% to around 70% out of 80% respectively from 2002 to 2010 and counted for about 20% higher from the earliest to the latest time observed.
Meanwhile, due to the education level, the ownership percentage increased gradually between 2002 and 2010 in each qualification level. As is shown by the graph, postgraduate qualification and bachelor’s degree roughly accounted for the high number of ownership's percentage. However, the trend range of computer belongings in no high school diploma essentially was the highest increase of ownership percentage range among all qualification levels. It sharply jumped to more than two times higher, about 15% and more than 40% out of 100% in 2002 and 2010 respectively. On the other hand, the smallest percentage range was true for the postgraduate level that climbed up only from 80% in 2002 to about 95% in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-30 | Binhchuduy | 82 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | quan12341234 | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-19 | faztaz | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-03 | HappyCandy | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-03 | HappyCandy | 89 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...an eight-year period from 2002 to 2010. Meanwhile the second graph details the figure mor...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, regarding, second, so, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1343.0 965.302439024 139% => OK
No of words: 257.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22568093385 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.908773075 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505836575875 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 388.8 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1625867135 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.090909091 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.18181818182 5.23603664747 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339178670503 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143878396043 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778916193684 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208156009287 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.090118819533 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...an eight-year period from 2002 to 2010. Meanwhile the second graph details the figure mor...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, regarding, second, so, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1343.0 965.302439024 139% => OK
No of words: 257.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22568093385 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.908773075 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505836575875 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 388.8 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1625867135 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.090909091 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.18181818182 5.23603664747 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339178670503 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143878396043 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778916193684 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208156009287 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.090118819533 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.