The chart shows the result of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart details the surveyed information done on the drinking or buying coffee habits of the people residing in five different Australian cities( Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Hobart, and Adelaide) in the last 4 weeks.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the majority of people in all the cities chose to visit a cafe except Adelaide where instant coffee buyers and cafe visitors reported almost the same proportion.
According to the given illustration, nearly 64% of people in Melbourne loved to visit a cafe, as against 61% in Sydney. Also, whilst 3% fewer individuals opted for instant coffee in Sydney compared to 48% in Melbourne, the number of fresh coffee buyers was just below 45% in each of these cities.
Turning to the other cities, whereas more than 3 in every 5 people had a visit to a cafe in Hobart, this proportion fell to just 56% and 49% in Brisbane and Adelaide. Although Brisbane and Hobart followed a similar percentage of approximately 53% of instant buyers, nearly 1 out of 2 people in Adelaide bought instant coffee, just 1% above the cafe visitors. Also, with 34%, Brisbane and Adelaide observed the same number of fresh coffee buyers, while Hobart noticed a 4% jump in the same.
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 84
- Essay showing the process by which carbonated drinks are made also called a diagram essay 84
- The graph shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport 74
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities 78
- The graph below shows tourism statistics among Venezuelan students from 2011 to 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...obart noticed a 4% jump in the same.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1026.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00487804878 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62994244491 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609756097561 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.1775666198 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.571428571 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2857142857 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168532312203 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816104798969 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100523445569 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128755509761 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112427286616 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.