This chart shows the top eight honeymoon destinations for newlywed British couples in 2010. The results come from a survey of 5,000 couples.
The given chart gives information about eight famous places for 5000 British newly-married couples to spend their honeymoon in 2010.
Overall, the number-one honeymoon destination was Thailand, as opposed to The Lake District, which was at the bottom of the list.
Thailand and Bali were the most popular places, with around 1410 and 1335 couples respectively. Ranked in third place was Costa Rica, which was half as attractive as Thailand, with almost half of the number of couples visited in 2010. Next came the Maldives, when about 600 couples said they prefered visiting the Maldives for their honeymoon.
In the last place was The Lake District, with only 124 out of 5000 couples surveyed, whereas nearly 150 couples who were asked said they would prefer to fly to Spain to spend their honeymoon. Just over 200 couples who were surveyed believed that Paris was an ideal destination for their honeymoon. This was followed by The Greek Islands, approximately 450 couples who decided to put in an appearance at this place for their honeymoon.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-09 | maiphuonganh | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | maiphuonganh | view | |
| 2023-09-09 | maiphuonganh | view | |
| 2023-09-09 | maiphuonganh | view | |
| 2023-09-09 | maiphuonganh | view |
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same roads causes some problems What are the problems and what can be done to reduce them 73
- the recycling process of glass bottles 89
- The graph below shows the number of visitors to three museums between 2000 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- This chart shows the top eight honeymoon destinations for newlywed British couples in 2010 The results come from a survey of 5 000 couples 84
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08092485549 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56015208459 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578034682081 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.7387364528 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.875 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2827859438 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139267926428 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703825212553 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177609968264 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0817830617757 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.