This chart shows the top eight honeymoon destinations for newlywed British couples in 2010. The results come from a survey of 5,000 couples.
The bar chart compares places where the British honeymooners go during a year 2010. In general, the couples from UK preferred to go to Asia than the islands and in Europe. Overall, what stands out from the graph is that the couples enjoyed their staying in Thailand most, while the Lake District was the least popular among the couples.
The most interesting point of the chart is that Thailand was in the first place in list with 1,410 couples and Bali followed in the second with 1,335 couples. After that, Costa Rica was twice as popular as the Greek Island, at 750 and 432 respectively. The Maldives followed by Costa Rica and took the fourth place in the list with 600.
In contrast, The Lake District was the least interested places by British honeymooners with 124 and Spain got little more interested than the last one with 124.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-09 | May Phyu Zaw | 56 | view |
| 2019-02-03 | Sai_26 | 86 | view |
| 2019-01-20 | Aung Naing Myo | 56 | view |
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 56
- These days, people change career several times during their life. What are the advantages and disadvantagesof this? 61
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the percentage of greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 73
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?What sort of punishment should parents and 56
- These days, people change career several times during their life. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as the least popular among the couples. The most interesting point of the chart ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, while, in contrast, in general, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 693.0 965.302439024 72% => OK
No of words: 148.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68243243243 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48791127476 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32498222933 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574324324324 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 194.4 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8693224616 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137686467032 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674211199432 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542693960373 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0949814160081 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654530852639 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.