The chart shows the total number of minutes (in millions) of telephone calls in Finland, divided into three categories, from 1995 – 2004.
The figure elucidates the amount number of minutes of telephone calls in Finland in three different indicators between 1995 and 2004. At first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable changes occurred for telephone calls in local-landline in comparison with other aspects and is measured in minutes (millions).
To begin with, 1995 to 2001 witnessed a dramatic upsurge for the total of telephone calls in local-landline categories where it, initially, stood at 12000 and peaked roughly to well above a half of 32000 in 2001. Unfortunately, it plunged sharply, plummeting to 12000 by the end of the period shown.
In contrast, there was a gradual growth in the number of national and international landline from 1995, which made up at 6000, to 2004, which constituted at well under two-thirds of 18000. Following the same pattern as national and international landline, in the first 5 years, the number of telephone calls for mobiles’ category experienced slight progress and achieved approximately to just across 2000 in four-sixths of 3000. Afterwards, it, erratically, uplifted highly to just below 10000 in 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-11 | alifdores | 78 | view |
| 2018-06-11 | minhchau2205 | 61 | view |
| 2018-06-11 | minhchau2205 | 61 | view |
| 2017-02-03 | Trangnguyen95 | 73 | view |
| 2017-02-03 | Trangnguyen95 | 73 | view |
- Bar Chart : Percentage Participate of men in senior development position. 84
- the bar chart estimated maximum population of asian elephants 69
- the pie charts and table give information about the total value of fish imported to the us between 1988 and 2000. 73
- The maps below show Hunderstone town at present and a proposed plan for it 77
- The chart below shows the amount of good transported in the UK from 1974 to 2002. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, third, well, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31843575419 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10485886308 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620111731844 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.420672552 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256056778014 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113603390481 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109645578694 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170388043627 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836258908623 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.