The chart shows the weight assessment of inhabitants of Charlestown in 1955 and 2015

The bar chart compares the different weight among the residents by aged group of Charlestown in 1955 and in 2015.
Generally, young citizens mostly have the best ideal body shape, while the incidence of obesity was increased dramatically among adult citizens of Charlestown. In the other hand, the proportion of residents had become underweight in 2015 lower than in 1955.
In 1955, the youngest age group had fewest number of weight problems, with more than 7% of 20-29-year-olds were found to be in healthy weight range, being underweight was a more significant affecting more than 25% in all group and elderly people with just above 40% classified as underweight. The incidence of Obesity become the lowest weight issues, impacting seriously among 50-59 age group with less than 10%, while overweight problem was found among middle aged with just above 20%.
In 2015, elderly people have the most health problem which overweight and obesity become popular among this age group with 60% and 28% respectively, while the proportion of underweight had fallen at 10%. However, the youngest age being healthier among all age and the percentage of underweight was showed downward trend with 20%.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the fewest'.
Suggestion: had the fewest
... 1955. In 1955, the youngest age group had fewest number of weight problems, with more th...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20207253886 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70292561261 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533678756477 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.354810953 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.428571429 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5714285714 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57142857143 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157642944018 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997195966353 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105719026927 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144311501864 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119667051142 0.0819641961636 146% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.