The charts below compare the age structure of the populations of France and India in 1984.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given horizontal bar charts illustrate the age pyramids of men and women in the two countries France and India in the year 1984.
Overall, French females’ life expectancy tend to be longer than its counterpart, whereas a perfectly balanced structure of Indian citizens can be observed.
Regarding the bar chart of France, the two genders witnessed most equality, ranging from 2.5 to 4 up to the age of 60. Progressively, the difference between the two sexes was prominent. The female percentage was 0.5 more than the male proportion for the ages 65-70 and 70-75. For the age groups 70-75 and 80-85, women’s percentages were 3 times as much as men’s. The final age group saw the most pronounced distinction: 4 times higher for women as compared to men.
Concerning the bar chart of India, it was impeccably symmetrical. The percentages of each sex decreased according to the age groups, from around 7% to around 1%. Nonetheless, there was a slight increase of about 0.5% in the proportions of the ages over 70, with the equivalence between males and females.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-11-05 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 78 | view |
- The diagram below gives information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people believe that traditional culture is being damaged as it is used as a tool for making money in the tourism industry Others think it is the only way to protect culture and tradition Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The maps below compare 2 floor plans of one trade conference held in 2009 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... equivalence between males and females.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nonetheless, regarding, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96111111111 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89611809151 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4728688797 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135642058573 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056438529783 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475263300653 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0898434309889 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543552603537 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.