The charts below give information about the price of tickets on one airline between Sydney and Melbourne, Australia, over a two-week period in 2013.
The bar chart compared about the rate of tickets on one airline from Sydney and Melbourne, Australia, overall two-week period in 2013.
Overall, we can see that the rate of tickets in Melbourne to Sydney at Friday is highest. However, the completely different we can see if we look at the specific figures.
Look at the first bar chart in Sydney in 2013. It can be seen that, the rate of tickets in the first week at Monday is highest among seven days and have number figures 80 dollars. Meanwhile, in the second week at Monday have significantly reduced is 50 dollars, Tuesday and Wednesday is stable have number is 30 dollars. By contrast, four days weekend with not change in number for both week.
With remaining 2 weeks in Melbourne in 2013, only a few dollars apart. With the first week in Melbourne at Friday is highest and have number is 80 dollars. Second, after Friday is Monday and Saturday is 60 dollars. However, this number is significantly down and have only 40 dollars at Monday, 60 dollars at Friday and 50 dollars at Saturday. With Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday have same number is 30 dollars. Finally, at Sunday is stable for both week is 50 dollars. So, it can be seen that the price of tickets in Sydney is higher than Melbourne in 2013.
- Some believe that people are naturally born leaders while others feel that leadership skills can develop Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- The bar chart give information about the rate of adults of kind of age in the UK who used the Internet everyday from 2003 to 2006 61
- Certain old buildings are more worth preserving than other ones Which types of old building should be preserving Do you think advantages outweigh disadvantages 89
- The bar chart show the price production in four countries from 2005 to 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features relevant 67
- The diagram below show the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, look, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1038.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59292035398 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45445632714 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451327433628 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4557222933 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.1428571429 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1428571429 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209200813024 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957879307318 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121022964216 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185440854021 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.160574420425 0.0819641961636 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.81 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.