The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000.
The given charts illustrate the information about the ways of water use in four specific countries during the year 2000. The data is calebroted in per centum which is clear and coherent representation.
It can be seen that the water was used for three specific purpose: for agriculture, domestic, and for the industrial purpose. According to chart, in Canada the 8% use of water for agriculture. Moving forward, the maximum (80%) use of water in Canada for the industrial purpose, and the 12% had been used for domestic. Moving ahead, in newziland the 44% water was used for agriculture. Furthermore, the 46%, 10% had been used for domestic and industrialization respectively.
As far as trend was concerned the maximum (92%) use of water in India for the agriculture. Apart from this, the 5% and 3% had been used for the domestic and industrial purposes. On the other hand, in china 69% water was used for agriculture. Moreover, the 9% and 22% had been used for domestic and industrialization respectively.
Overall, it is evident that the maximum percentage water used in india for agriculture as compared to other three countries. In Canada the maximum water was used for industrial purpose.
- Some people believe that positive feedback at work is important to perform effectively while others argue that positive feedback is a spoiler and people become too confident and their performance degrades. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 73
- The charts below show the percentage of their food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit down restaurants. 56
- Some people believe that playing a musical instrument can be beneficial in many different ways Others think it is a waste of time to play a musical instrument Discuss both views and give your own opinion 42
- Some people think that only the society should be blamed for any anti social activities What are causes for these activities Who is responsible for them 82
- The three pie charts below show the changes in aunual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e seen that the water was used for three specific purpose: for agriculture, domes...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, apart from, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03015075377 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09304544552 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457286432161 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.6760683606 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.0 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3076923077 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30769230769 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2648127159 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13379034517 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0981931328726 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206961244116 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0952079474588 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.3 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.