The assigned pie charts contrast the proportion of world expenditure on a series of requirements and the distribution of population among four main continents, namely, Asia, Africa, Americas, Europe and Others.
From an overall perspective, people spend varies on different expenditures, it is obvious that considerable money was spend on other aspects on top of food, clothing, housing, transport. In the meantime, more than half of the population came from asia, which is far higher than the population in other places.
In terms of world spending, nearly 40 percent of expenditures around the world were attributed to additional requirements. While food stood at the second important position with a figure of 24 percent, which was two amount percent than house spending. Moreover, which was superior to spending on transport, the latter accounted for 18 percent of total expending. The lowest spending was attributed to clothing, merely 6 percent.
Moving to the remaining term world population, more than half of inhabitants live in Asia, while world population of americas and europe saw a identical percentage, all were 14 percent of total population. Following that, africa accounted for the minority proportion of world population when compared with three other continents, to be species, with a figure of 10 percent. In addition to that, there still left approximately 5 percent population living in other places.
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon and two possible sites for a new supermarket Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The table shows the number of mobile phones and personal computers per 1000 people in 2003 in 6 different counties Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The table gives information about students studying six different subjects in an australia university in 2009 female first language not english born outside australia english 67 18 11 modern languages 63 61 47 history 58 10 12 math 47 48 38 physics 46 47 73
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant https www tes 56
- The Maps below gives information on the Village Park ten years ago and now 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
... is obvious that considerable money was spend on other aspects on top of food, clothi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 217, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'amount' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'amounts'.
Suggestion: amounts
...h a figure of 24 percent, which was two amount percent than house spending. Moreover, ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...d population of americas and europe saw a identical percentage, all were 14 perce...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, second, still, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1211.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45495495495 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03086214046 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585585585586 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0552928554 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.1 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111764369509 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486779470127 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.020253887566 0.0843802449381 24% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0738581201322 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015379183964 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.