Consumption of meat
The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The line chart compares the weekly consumption per person of fish,lamb,beef,chicken in a European country over the period from 1979 to 2004.
It is clear that vary number among four breeds of meat consumption during 25 years. While Chicken that gained more favour had a continuously increased, Beef and Lamb losed its market saw a decreased. Whatelse, Fish had a stable consumption over that period.
In 1979, Beef was accounted for the majority meat consumption with a figure of 210 grams. Subsequently Lamb had a similar consumption as Beef stood at the second with 150 gram per person per week. Following that, Fish had the minority market, approximately 60 grams. However, Beef saw a suddendy flucature in the next decade, and Chicken saw a increased with the rate of 5 grams per year. While Lamb met a moderately decreased and Fish saw a negligble change.
In 1989, Chicken took place Beef as the highest consumption among four breeds of meat. To be species, 200 grams per person per week, a little cent higher than Beef, and chicken consumption continuously soar over the remaining period, by the contrast, Beef met a slump and stay at around 100 grams in 2004, which was less two times than Chicken at that time. Moving to the remaining two meat, Lamb had a familar trend with Beef and stay at around 50 grams. While Fish remained at the same level compared with itself in two decades ago, was under 50 grams.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-15 | appollo abu | 73 | view |
- The table shows the percentage of journeys made by different forms of transport in four countries The bar chart shows the results of a survey into car use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where re 78
- Consumption of meat The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 73
- The table shows the number of mobile phones and personal computers per 1000 people in 2003 in 6 different counties Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The table below gives information about the weekly consumption of ordinary milk and butter and high and low fat alternatives of milk and butter among different age groups in one European country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the mai 67
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon and two possible sites for a new supermarket Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 66, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , lamb
...he weekly consumption per person of fish,lamb,beef,chicken in a European country over...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , chicken
...consumption per person of fish,lamb,beef,chicken in a European country over the period f...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Subsequently,
...consumption with a figure of 210 grams. Subsequently Lamb had a similar consumption as Beef ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...on as Beef stood at the second with 150 gram per person per week. Following that, Fi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 343, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ure in the next decade, and Chicken saw a increased with the rate of 5 grams per ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1180.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79674796748 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75295405546 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544715447154 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 333.0 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.6990609142 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7692307692 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9230769231 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194785253747 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0903536048616 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750695354119 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154372607339 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474957088343 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.