The assigned tabular chart compares the proportion of number of mobile holders and PC owners in 2003 among six different conturies, namely, Luxemburg,Italy,Singapore,Germany,South Korea and China.
From an overall perspective, Luxemburg was superior when compared with the other countries both on mobile holders and PC owners. While the other countries accounted for moderately lower proportion in that, while China saw a sharp slump both on mobile holders and PC owners.
In 2003, Luxemburg hosted the highest rank in number of mobile holders among six countries with a figure of 872 per thousand people. Followed by Italy and Singapore, with the figures of 737 and 684, respectively. Following that, Germany and South Korea accounted for minority of mobile holders, with the range between 350 and 600. Whatelse, china was nearly less than 10 times as South Korea in mobile holders per thousand people.
In terms of PC owners, Luxemburg and Singapore accounted for majority among six countries in number of PC owners per thousand people, to be specific, 900 for Luxemburg and 860 for singapore. Subsequnently, Italy, Germany and South Korea remained at the same level in PC owners, all were nearly 450 per thousand people. In the meantime, China accounted for the miniority proportion of PC owners, merely 88 per thousand people.
- The charts below give information about world spending and population Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisonswhere relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much 78
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The table shows the percentage of journeys made by different forms of transport in four countries The bar chart shows the results of a survey into car use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where re 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Italy
...x different conturies, namely, Luxemburg,Italy,Singapore,Germany,South Korea and China...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Germany
...uries, namely, Luxemburg,Italy,Singapore,Germany,South Korea and China. From an overa...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1128.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32075471698 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.49744350513 2.65546596893 132% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2754872397 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.8 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.3 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0864255388035 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043842438658 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0336435824342 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0644727253019 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285852304138 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.