The charts below give information on the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050
The pie charts illustrate the information about people consistency in 2000 and prediction of population growth in 2050 under three various age groups ( 0-14 years, 15-59 years and 60+ years) in two different countries.
Overall, the major proportion of all countries was mid agers while least proportion was children and elderly people in given periods.
Furthermore, In Yemen, There was the greatest age team was dependence who was belonging more than 60 years old. It was approximately half of the total population in 2000. Secondly, Percentage of strangers had been kept around 46% while, another type which is the offspring group was exact 3.6% in the same year. And then, According to projection in Yemen, when 2050, children and earners will be gradually climbed and elderly people will be decreased from 50.1% to 37%.
Turning to Italy, It was not similar to Yemen So earners had been major population in 2000 and 2050 while older people will be the lowest consistency. However, kids team will have significant difference approximately 18 % space of two years.
- Children nowadays spend a great deal of time watching television however television cannot replace the book as a learning tool which is why children are less well educated today To what extent do you agree with this statement 78
- The graph below given information from the 2008 report about the consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with a projection until 2030. 78
- Many museum charges for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museum outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- The main purpose of public libraries should be to provide books. Public libraries should not spend their limited resources on computer software, videos or DVDs. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h in 2050 under three various age groups 0-14 years, 15-59 years and 60+ years in...
^^
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'while the least'.
Suggestion: while the least
...oportion of all countries was mid agers while least proportion was children and elderly peo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 75, Rule ID: NON_ACTION_CONTINUOUS[2]
Message: The verb belong is usually not used with a continuous form, use the simple form instead. Suggestion: 'belonged'
Suggestion: belonged
...he greatest age team was dependence who was belonging more than 60 years old. It was approxim...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 75, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...he greatest age team was dependence who was belonging more than 60 years old. It was approxim...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14942528736 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7372323278 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64367816092 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3718308728 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183660196839 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812707516328 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722843627272 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109995532558 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710885505823 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.