The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.
The pie charts compare the proportion of populations in Yemen and Italy according to 3 different age groups in 2000, with the future forecast for 2050.
Looking at the details, in 2000, the age structure in Yemen was not completely the same as Italy, with a majority of its population below 14 years old, whereas in Italy most of the population was between 15 and 59 years old (61.6%). However, we see that in Yemen the lowest area of demographic was over 60 years old (3.6%), while in another country this figure is represented with 24.1%.
Regarding statistic information, in 2050, the population with 15-59 years is expected to be the highest percentage around 57.3% and also 60 years or more would increase to 5.7%. In contrast, in Italy, the projections show that the number of people with 15-59 years will decrease to 46.2%, while people over 60 years would be more than 40%.
Overall, both countries, Yemen and Italy, are forecasted to have adolescent and adult as the vast majority of populations in 2050.
- The society would benefit from a ban o all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinion? 61
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transportDiscuss both the 89
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers not people Why Do you think it is a positive or negative development 92
- The line graph below gives information about the rates of unemployment between 1991 and 2005 in three different countries in Europe. The table shows the percentage of men and women in the workforce in these three countries. 78
- The graphs show figures relating to hours worked and stress levels amongst professionals in eight groups Describe the information shown to a university or collage lecturer 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, regarding, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 844.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82285714286 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59277489047 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582857142857 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.5035271394 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.666666667 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1666666667 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1666666667 5.23603664747 213% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265366689423 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144068936341 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127968670335 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188038759567 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126002384538 0.0819641961636 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.27 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.