The ultimated use of cars may cause many problems. What are those problems?
In order to reduce the problem, should we discourage people to use cars?
These days, possessing personal cars is becoming increasingly popular. As a result, many families buy more than one car. Some say it can offer flexibility to their life, while others argue that huge problems have been identified such as environmental impacts, crucial traffic jam or even car waste. In this essay, I will discuss the reasons for this and propose some solutions.
Firstly, The widespread use of cars has been deleterious impact on air environment. It is education that road traffic, fulling of exhaust from vehicles, is one amongst the biggest sources of air pollution. In addition, The cars’ gas emission can cause acid rain and greenhouse effect. To tackle this problem, authorities should focus on banning cars which release toxic gases and imposing campaign for alternative energy sources in cars, as biogas or electricity.
Furthermore, The traffic jam is normally to be controversial nowadays. Failing to improve the quality of public transports due to the reason why demanding personal car still high. It is getting public attention, there is boring event, happening on rush hours everyday, for commuters in intense city. To deal with this issue, public transports should be made available to everyone with good quality and also reasonable price.
In addition, the other effects from using excessively personal cars is car waste. Every year end of life vehicles generate around the world have dramatically increased. Some say it is important to cope these problems with managing and recycling correctly by setting clear targets for reuse, recycling and recovery of vehicles and their components. I think, producers should attend to manufacture new vehicles with a view to their recyclability.
In conclusion, there is an urgent need for the governments to focus on addressing a rise in consuming cars, which attribute to the rise of air pollution and intense traffic. At the same time, it demands to strengthen the policy about recycling vehicles. Personally, the government should gradually promote alternative vehicles or public transports instead of discouraging the car use suddenly, causes they may face great opposition from manufacturers.
- Fast foods are bad. Do you agree? 73
- Some people think that increasing communication usage of computers and mobile phones by young people has had a negative effect on their reading and writing skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Scientists predict that humans will speak the same language in the future. Do you think it is a positive or negative development? ? 70
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantage? 61
- Writing, reading and maths are the three major subjects. Some people think that computer skills should be added as a fourth subject. What extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 470, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rces in cars, as biogas or electricity. Furthermore, The traffic jam is normally...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 260, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...s boring event, happening on rush hours everyday, for commuters in intense city. To deal...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, still, then, while, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1845.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42647058824 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93661263561 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617647058824 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4051480632 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1052631579 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8947368421 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84210526316 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232631830478 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066353001502 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704093664853 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125740323188 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479782830085 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.