The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The mentioned pie charts illustrate the data about the three different age groups of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and estimation after 50 years.

Overall, as is represented by the pie charts, in Yemen children had the highest ratio in 2000 but after 50 years the first place will be taken by 15-59 age groups whereas old people will have the lowest figure as before. Similarly, in Italy 15-59 years had accounted more than half of population while old people had the lowest ratio and this will remain the lowest in future also.

It is clear from the charts that in 2000 had the highest ratio (50.1%) followed by 15-59 group and 60+ people had the lowest figure of only 3.6% .However, it is forecasted that 15-59 age group will account more than half of population (57.3%) while slight decrement will be noticed in 0-14 group from 50.1% to 37.0% . Although, the rate of 60+ will increase steadily from 3.6% to 5.7% it will remain the lowest ratio.

Likewise, in Italy, 15-59 had figure of 61.6% which will considerably decrease to 46.2%. However, the ratio of 60+ accounted for 24.1% which will sharply increase up to 42.3%. In addition, 60+ years age group had proportion of 14.3% which is going to steadily decrease and will reach 11.5% in future.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-09 Molor-Od 67 view
2020-01-08 pateldhruv1708 61 view
2019-12-18 aghasaeed 89 view
2019-12-04 morbymuku 67 view
2019-12-04 morbymuku 67 view
Essays by user Sagarjango :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...d this will remain the lowest in future also. It is clear from the charts that in...
^^^^
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...eople had the lowest figure of only 3.6% .However, it is forecasted that 15-59 age...
^^
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...ple had the lowest figure of only 3.6% .However, it is forecasted that 15-59 age group ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 312, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...oticed in 0-14 group from 50.1% to 37.0% . Although, the rate of 60+ will increase...
^^
Line 5, column 315, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ced in 0-14 group from 50.1% to 37.0% . Although, the rate of 60+ will increase steadily...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 291, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... steadily decrease and will reach 11.5% in future.
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, likewise, similarly, so, whereas, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 1.00243902439 998% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1029.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69863013699 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23167931432 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474885844749 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.1452963286 43.030603864 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.625 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.375 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.375 5.23603664747 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0798990410244 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445449972609 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042620398838 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0693930420042 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441141427924 0.0819641961636 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.