The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
The pie graphs below compare the percentages of the population in three different age groups, in two nations, in 2000 and 2050.
Overall, people in both countries are going to grow older in the next 50 years. Therefore, the age group 0-14 tends to decrease in the future.
By 2000, just over half of the population aged 0-14 in Yemen while this figure was 14.3% in Italy. Besides, people who aged 15-59 accounted for 46.3% and 61.6%, in Yemen and Italy, respectively. The group aged over 60 occupied 3.6% of the inhabitants of Yemen while this number in Italy was almost a quarter of the population.
By 2050, in Yemen, while people aged 15-59 are expected to grow rapidly from 46.3% to 57.3%, the children aged under 15 are anticipated to drop dramatically to 37%. In Italy, although the group aged 15-59 is predicted to decrease quickly to 46.2%, people aged over 60 tend to rise nearly double from 24,1% (2000).
- The bar chart below shows the proportions of English men and women of different ages who were living alone in 2011. The pie chart compares the numbers of bedrooms in these one-person households. 78
- Some people think that in the modern world we are more dependent on each other, while others think that people have become more independent. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music?Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays? 73
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because oftechnology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that peoplemake? Has this been a positive or negative development? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 761.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72670807453 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4221054174 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6257183829 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.125 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269878606775 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121258520766 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674561370863 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162786762803 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0813138584163 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.