The charts below give infornation about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000.
The given first pie chart reveals the information about three different ways in which water can be used and the second horizontal chart illustrates about the three stages of water used by four different countries: Canada, New Zealand, India and China in year 2000. The data is celibrated in percentum which in clearly and coherently representaion.
It can be seen that, in all over the world, 70% of the water were used in the agriculture activities in the year 2000. Furthermore, 22% water was used in the industry departments. Moreover, rest of the 8% of the water had been used for the domestic works in the year 2000.
As far as trend is concerned, in Canada 8% of water were used in agriculture, 12% were used in domestic and 80% water was used in industry. In addition to this, 44% water was used in agriculture, 46% were used in domestic and 10% water was used in industry in New Zealand. Apart from all this, in India and China 92% and 62% water was used by agriculture, 5% and 9% were used in domestic and at last 3% and 22% water was used in industry in year 2000 respectively.
Overall it is evedent that, more water was used in the agriculture in all over the world and on the other hand, in India and China more water was used in agriculture as compare to domestic and industry.
- The following graph and pie chart shows the sales of a company in the first and the second quadrent of the year. 67
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990. 30
- Some people say that computer games are bad for childrens by all means while other believe that these games are contributing to childrens development. 61
- The table shows the prices of steel vis a vis the consumption in selected countries 59
- The graph below compares figures for production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000. It also predicts the figures of 2025. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, apart from, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51271186441 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61729642795 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.415254237288 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.0 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.8183320128 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.333333333 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2222222222 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392828107828 0.215688989381 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.192357364287 0.103423049105 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833024377306 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257416308945 0.15604864568 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702458671595 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.