The charts below provide the primary reason tourists visited Orange City in two different years.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The left chart illustrate how 1 million tourists visted Orange city in 2016 and the right chart is for 1.9 million tourists who had visited in the year 2019.Additionaly, the colors correspond to the color table given above, which deontes the reasons
In the year 2006, annual events in Orange city was the primary attraction for tourists, which attracted 45000 tourists.Following the annual event, museums were attended by 27000 of tourists which was even more than the combined count of theaters and restaurants which resulted in about only 23000.
Surprisingly in 2019, when total count of tourists visiting Orange city increased ,according to the survey restaurants were the primary reason they visited Orange city, followed by annual events with a major difference of 9%.Similarly, museums also faced a decline in their proportion as less number of tourists visited them.Also, theatre and other reasons as to which tourists visited the city, shared the same ratio of 8%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-02 | JAY9923 | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-15 | thienthutuyet | view | |
| 2020-10-14 | omegaji | 73 | view |
| 2020-08-29 | anirudh8860 | 73 | view |
- Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street while others think that it is the right thing to do Which point of view do you think is correct and why 75
- hello hello 3
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 67
- The chart below gives attendance figures for Grandville Stadium from 2017 which are projected through 2030 after a major improvement project 78
- Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street while others think that it is the right thing to do Which point of view do you think is correct and why 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 158, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Additionaly
...urists who had visited in the year 2019.Additionaly, the colors correspond to the color tab...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e given above, which deontes the reasons In the year 2006, annual events in Orang...
^^^
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Following
...ourists, which attracted 45000 tourists.Following the annual event, museums were attended...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 22, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...about only 23000. Surprisingly in 2019, when total count of tourists visiting O...
^^
Line 4, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rprisingly in 2019, when total count of tourists visiting Orange city increased ...
^^
Line 4, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... tourists visiting Orange city increased ,according to the survey restaurants wer...
^^
Line 4, column 109, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... city increased ,according to the survey restaurants were the primary reason they...
^^
Line 4, column 228, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Similarly
...al events with a major difference of 9%.Similarly, museums also faced a decline in their ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 328, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Also
...as less number of tourists visited them.Also, theatre and other reasons as to which ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, similarly, so, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 825.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28846153846 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83998957087 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596153846154 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 2.0 8.94146341463 22% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 78.0 22.4926829268 347% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.0 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 412.5 112.824112599 366% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 78.0 22.9334400587 340% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 15.0 5.23603664747 286% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237631108836 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194283194457 0.103423049105 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0232860654848 0.0843802449381 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162138435609 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589029823856 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 42.5 13.2329268293 321% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 0.77 61.2550243902 1% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 32.5 10.3012195122 315% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.59 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.55 8.06136585366 143% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 27.0 11.4329268293 236% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 33.2 10.9970731707 302% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 33.0 11.0658536585 298% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.