The charts below show the average annual spending for canadian households in the year 1972 and the year 2002.
The pie chart reveals the average of yearly house hold expenditures of Canadian dwellers in two distinct years 1972 and 2002.
It is clear from the chart that maximum spending was done on food 39% and minimum spending was on computers, in 1972 .Moreover, In 2002, the highest spending percentage was of cars to 40% and least spending percentage was on books . Whereas, these percentages are quite opposite to each other in both the years . There was dramatic fall in food expenditure, and slightly less than double increase in use of cars in 2002.
Similarly , The change of percentage of expense on books and computer was noticeable .The expense percentage on computers in ,1972 was same as expense percentage on books in, 2002 to three percentge. Furthermore ,expenses on restaurants doubled to 14 ; and spending on petrol and furniture declined by one and two percentage which became same 9 percentage in 2002.
Charts illustrates the huge variations between these two decades, where people were more conscious about their basic needs after two decades they started spending money on other expenditures like cars restaurants and computers .
- In many places prisons are overcrowded and expensive for governments to maintain Yet when offenders are released they end up back in prison a short while later Does prison work Should lawbreakers be rehabilitated or punished 59
- The charts below show the average annual spending for canadian households in the year 1972 and the year 2002 78
There was dramatic fall
There was a dramatic fall
in use of cars in 2002.
in the use of cars in 2002.
Sentence: Similarly , The change of percentage of expense on books and computer was noticeable .The expense percentage on computers in ,1972 was same as expense percentage on books in, 2002 to three percentge.
Error: percentge Suggestion: percentage
flaws:
Don't put a space before punctuation marks.
Always put a space after punctuation marks. Essay e-rater is sensitive.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 10
No. of Words: 185 200
No. of Characters: 929 1000
No. of Different Words: 104 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.688 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.022 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.715 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 62 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 55 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 41 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 24 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26.429 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.878 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.571 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.443 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.75 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.068 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4