The charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the years 2010
The pie charts given below illustrate the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. The data is measured in percentage. In general, it can be seen that the most popular percentage in malaysia was Housing and followed by other Goods and Service in Japan. Both of Malaysia and Japan were similar smallest percentage which was health care.
In Japan, based on the first pie charts, the largest percentage was other Good and service, which had 29%. Different from Food as the second biggest percentage was 24%. Housing and Transport were similar percentage, which was Housing represent 21% and Transport got a fifth. Health Care had 6%, which was the lowest percentage.
On the other hand, Malaysia showed average household expenditures which was dominated by housing, at 34%. The second most popular was 27% from Food. Followed by Other Goods and Services, it got 26%. The smallest percentage of all household expenditures are transport and healthcare which had total 13%
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-13 | eka trisna | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-15 | RAHMAYANI | 61 | view |
- The charts below show US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years
- The two pie charts below show some employment pattern in Great Britain In 1992 67
- The table below given information on the proportion of carbohydrates protein and fat diets 61
- The charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 841.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15950920245 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64924143552 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527607361963 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3235800423 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.0833333333 112.824112599 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.5833333333 22.9334400587 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27150150973 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11127827943 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.195677049335 0.0843802449381 232% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212593974701 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.162761121012 0.0819641961636 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 61.2550243902 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.