The pie charts compare the average percentages in four meals of sodium, saturated fat and added sugars.
It is obvious that the quantity of consuming nutrients for dinner in sodium and saturated fat are higher than the figures for the three other sectors, while the snack meal records the highest consumption in Added sugar. Such dramatic differences are not seen in nutrient consumption of saturated fat.
In pie charts of added sugar, the percentages of sugar for snacks is about 42% while dinner is approximately under a half (23%). However, the two mentioned meals in added sugars record an opposite nutrient. The principal purpose of consuming food is for dinner, occupying 43% and 37% in sodium and saturated fat, while snack is the least important one at 14% and 24%.
In terms of consuming nutrients for breakfast and lunch, the gap among three pie charts is not significant. The same proportion of nutrients in saturated fat and added sugar (16%) is used for breakfast, compared to 14% in sodium. Whereas, in lunch meals of 3 pie has remain rto under a fours in sodium (29%),followed by 26% for saturated fat and at least in added sugar.
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information bu selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Many countries today are experiencing high levels of migration from rural areas to cities What are the causes of this trend and what effects does it have on the existing city dewellers 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 265, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
...m. Whereas, in lunch meals of 3 pie has remain rto under a fours in sodium 29%,followe...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 282, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a four' or simply 'fours'?
Suggestion: a four; fours
...nch meals of 3 pie has remain rto under a fours in sodium 29%,followed by 26% for satur...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, while, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84693877551 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66365623841 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525510204082 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3685632418 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.555555556 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0858597937839 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514789951763 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353273882034 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0738069416106 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287551339557 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.