The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,
and make comparisons where relevant.
The three pie charts elucidate the precise information regarding consumption of various nutrients by the people of the USA in their edibles that are measured in percentage. The nutrients such as sodium, saturated fats and added sugar are considered.
Overall, the bar graphs highlight that consumption is classified based on their food intakes. It is observed that a large portion of these contents were consumed during dinner and lunch, whereas breakfast was made up of least proportion with all three nutritional factors. However, these levels depicted a few ebbs and flows during snack times.
As the pie charts reveal that in dinner, the levels of sodium, saturated fats and added sugar constitutes about 43%, 37% and 23% respectively. Moreover, these figures witnessed a slight decline for meals in the afternoon with nearly one-third of sodium, and just over a quarter of saturated fats and finally almost one-fifth of added sugar in total. In contrast, in the mornings for breakfast, these noticed an extremely low rate with less than 20% for all the three categories.
Furthermore, with regard to snacks, people consumed a large amount of added sugar which contributed one-half of all, while the saturated fat and sodium rates plunged to 21% and 14% individually.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 11 | view |
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2023-11-10 | Mayuresh0809 | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-10 | MinyiChu | 61 | view |
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this case What can be done about this problem 89
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015 84
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both these vi 89
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language Discuss both these views and give your ow 79
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fats and added sugar are considered. Overall, the bar graphs highlight that c...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the least'.
Suggestion: of the least
...nd lunch, whereas breakfast was made up of least proportion with all three nutritional f...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...w ebbs and flows during snack times. As the pie charts reveal that in dinner,...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an 20% for all the three categories. Furthermore, with regard to snacks, peop...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, third, whereas, while, in contrast, such as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1088.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30731707317 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7511243713 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614634146341 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2516551242 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.888888889 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.7777777778 5.23603664747 263% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0805941345729 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0346584368169 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0299176867904 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0546298220997 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293427698462 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.