The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant.
A glance at the three pie charts provided reveals a comparison of proportions of such nutrients in traditional American meals as sodium, saturated fat and added fat, which could be detrimental if over consumed.
It is evident from the information supplied that sodium and saturated fat are mostly consumed by Americans in dinner, at 43 and 37 percents respectively, while the highest percentage of added sugar is consumed as snack, at 43%. Moreover, the figure for breakfast witnesses the lowest proportion of consumption of three given nutrients.
With regard to dinner, it is the second figure after the figure for dinner, with the highest rates of sodium and saturated fat consumed in America, at 29 and 26 percents respectively. In stark contrast, however, added sugar eaten during lunch takes up only 19%, which is 10% lower than sodium and 7% lower than saturated fat, consumed in lunch time.
Also noteworthy is the fact that the figures for saturated fat and added sugar eaten during breakfast share similar percentages (16%), while the figure for sodium consumed in breakfast time shows a marginal difference, at 14%. More than that, the consumption of sodium as snack and for breakfast reveals the same percentage (14%).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | aria etemadi | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Noranmao | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Molor-Od | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Molor-Od | 64 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | Yosva Yosvi | 11 | view |
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ld be detrimental if over consumed. it is evident from the information supplie...
^^
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f consumption of three given nutrients. With regard to dinner, it is the second ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cond figure after the figure for dinner, with the highest rates of sodium and sat...
^^
Line 5, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... saturated fat, consumed in lunch time. Also note worthy is the fact that the fi...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...rated fat, consumed in lunch time. Also note worthy is the fact that the figure...
^^^^
Line 7, column 6, Rule ID: NOTE_WORTHY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'noteworthy'?
Suggestion: noteworthy
... fat, consumed in lunch time. Also note worthy is the fact that the figures for satura...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 6, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'notes'.
Suggestion: notes
... fat, consumed in lunch time. Also note worthy is the fact that the figures for...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, second, so, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1035.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12376237624 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7306142695 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539603960396 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.8508767912 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.857142857 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8571428571 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0874450137574 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480718820832 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356995588308 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0655834782341 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364343634116 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.