The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
The line graphs illustrate the differences in household possession of electronic devices and the number of hours spent on household chores in a nation over a 99-year period
Overall, it is apparent that there was the same upward trend witnessed in the ownership of all electrical appliances, however, washing machines showed a slightly different pattern. Meanwhile, the number of time people used to finish their housework declined continuously over time
Regarding the first chart, refrigerators were used by no one in the first year, however, they were reported with a dramatic surge to 100% in 1980 and stayed stable for the rest of the examined period. The same pattern was seen in the consumption of vacuum cleaners but with a lower degree, this electrical appliances' usage increased significantly by 70% from 1920 to 2000 then remained at the same point as washing machine onwards. Finally, although washing machine was the most popular electronic device in 1920, possessed by 40% of households, this figure gradually grew to just over 70% with a slight dip, ending up as the least common product
Looking at the remaining chart, thanks to the assistance of technology, the number of time people dedicated to housework weekly plummeted from 50 hours to 20 in 1960 before a steady decrease to 10 hours per week in the final year
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry 73
- the chart below compares the percentage of self employed workers in 5 nations from 1998 to 2008 78
- The following diagram shows how rainwater is reused for domestic purposes Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 49
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 73
- The table below shows information about age average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in USA Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'appliances'' or 'appliance's'?
Suggestion: appliances'; appliance's
...ut with a lower degree, this electrical appliances usage increased significantly by 70% fr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 647, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...p, ending up as the least common product Looking at the remaining chart, thanks t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, look, regarding, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1120.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06787330317 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75950588881 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628959276018 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 55.0 22.4926829268 245% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.527903908 43.030603864 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 280.0 112.824112599 248% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 55.25 22.9334400587 241% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 15.5 5.23603664747 296% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163807054935 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907123593463 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0249671314575 0.0843802449381 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0944452615893 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303559918437 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 30.1 13.2329268293 227% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 24.11 61.2550243902 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 23.6 10.3012195122 229% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.65 8.06136585366 132% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 28.0 11.4329268293 245% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 24.0 10.9970731707 218% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 24.0 11.0658536585 217% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.