The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph depicts the percentage of household electricity consumption attributed to various appliances from 1920 to 2019, while the second line graph provides information about the average number of hours spent on housework per week during the same period.
Overall, there is a clear upward trend in the usage of all electrical appliances. The consumption of electrical refrigerators reached its peak, experiencing a significant surge over time. Conversely, there is a downward trend in the number of hours spent on housework per week per household.
Regarding specific appliances, the usage of washing machines has shown a slight increase throughout the observed period, rising by approximately 30% from 40%, with a minor drop around 1980 of about 9%. Although the percentage of households with vacuum cleaners initially lagged behind those with washing machines, it caught up by 1960 and continued to rise steadily until reaching its peak in 2000, maintaining that level until 2019. On the other hand, the usage of refrigerators started from a minimum point in 1920 but experienced a sharp surge, surpassing vacuum cleaners by 1940 and washing machines by 1950. It reached its maximum point in 1980 and remained unchanged until 2019.
In contrast, the graph depicting the number of hours per week spent on housework shows a consistent decrease until around 1960, representing a reduction of approximately 30%. After that, the decline became more gradual towards the end of the period.
In conclusion, the data suggests that the consumption of refrigerators surpassed that of other appliances, indicating a higher preference for refrigeration among households. Additionally, the number of hours spent on housework per week did not increase significantly during the observed years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-17 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-13 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-03-11 | oanhlilies | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA are in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Every year several languages die out Some people think this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- Some university students want to learn other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, if, regarding, second, while, in conclusion, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 965.302439024 158% => OK
No of words: 277.0 196.424390244 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49458483755 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04606297614 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 106.607317073 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548736462094 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 283.868780488 158% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4240158425 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.833333333 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12815500299 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478321434934 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435177501759 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0806098357117 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466888914133 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 40.7170731707 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.