The given line graphs illustrate the changes in ownership of electrical devices and the number of hours per week we spent on household chores in residence in a nation from 1920 to 2019
Overall, it is obvious that the percentage of household with electrical gadgets saw an upward trend, opposite to a downward trend of hours for housework over the period shown. To begin with the first chart, the figures show significant growth in the ownership of all electrical equipment. In 1920, washing machine and vacuum cleaner began with 40% and 30% respectively, while refrigerators were introduced. After six decades, refrigerators had a dramatic acceleration and peaked at 100%. following this data was vacuum cleaner with figures less than 10%, while washing machines had a slight change in progress and grew from 60 to 70%. In 1980, both refrigerators and vacuum cleaner reached to maximum level nd washing machines increased marginally to nearly 75%
Moving to the second chart, each household spent 50 hours per week on washing clothes, preparing meals and cleaning at beginning of the period. The year 1980 witnessed a remarkable decrease of 35% in the percentage of time devoted to doing domestic work, then it continued to decline to 10%
- Some people feel that manufactures and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce to amount of packaging of goods While other argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packing Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given line graphs illustrate the cha...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...idence in a nation from 1920 to 2019 Overall, it is obvious that the percenta...
^^^^
Line 3, column 493, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Following
...amatic acceleration and peaked at 100%. following this data was vacuum cleaner with figur...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nes increased marginally to nearly 75% Moving to the second chart, each househo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, then, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1040.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09803921569 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79621524292 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627450980392 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.2568841959 43.030603864 224% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 148.571428571 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1428571429 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156875116121 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643969261812 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565182742168 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117749005867 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429652259233 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.