The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
The charts depict the ownership proportions of electrical appliances and the time spent on housework in one country from 1920 to 2019.
Overall, the ownership of three appliances all increased after nearly a century. There was also a change in the rankings of the ownership of electrical appliances. Moreover, the time dedicated to housework in many households decreased significantly over the years.
The percentage of washing machine owners used to rank first in 1920 with 40%. Throughout nearly 100 years, the proportion of households owning washing machines experienced a slight fluctuation before reaching 70% in 2019, but still fell to last place with 30% less than the first. No one in 1920 used refrigerators until 2019, when the ownership percentage of this appliance surged dramatically to 100%, making it the most owned gadget. The appliance also tying at the first place with refrigerator was vacuum cleaner with the ownership soaring threefold from 30% to 100%.
In 1920, people would spend 50 hours per week doing the chores. However, throughout the years, this was decreased significantly from 50 to 10 hours in 2019.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-17 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-13 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-03-11 | oanhlilies | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use
- The table below showss the average incomes of scientists employed by an organization 73
- Some people think the government funding should be used for supporting art and cultures others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- Some people think the government funding should be used for supporting art and cultures others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 956.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25274725275 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87664519012 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587912087912 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2989103972 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321068333489 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133145460855 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141423870787 0.0843802449381 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239262340401 0.15604864568 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.17950499974 0.0819641961636 219% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.