The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons

The line graphs depict proportion of families with electrical gadgets and time spent doing household chores per week between the year 1920-2019.
Overall, it can be observed that, houses buying refrigerator and vacuum cleaners went on increasing and there were some fluctuations in purchasing washing machines, meanwhile the time period used for doing housework went on declining gradually.
To begin with, in the year 1920 washing machine were bought the highest which accounted for 40 % whereas the refrigerators purchase was 30 % and no use of vacuum cleaner was seen, in 1940 for all the three appliances, there was a substantial growth in the electrical appliances availability in the families which was 50 %, 52 % and 60% respectively. The houses having vacuum cleaner and refrigerator went on increasing steadily upto 100%, for refrigerator in the year 1980 while for vacuum cleaner availability comprised of 100% in the families in the year 2000, afterwards both the appliances achieved a constant phase.
The washing machine was bought the most in 1920 which comprised for 40 %, increased uptill 1940 to 70 % and then slightly declined, increased again slowly which revealed 71% usage in 2019. The number of hours spent on housework showed downward trend going from 50 hours to 20 hours in 1960 and went on dramatically declining to 10 hours per week.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 268, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'appliances'' or 'appliance's'?
Suggestion: appliances'; appliance's
... a substantial growth in the electrical appliances availability in the families which was ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 189, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...lowly which revealed 71% usage in 2019. The number of hours spent on housework show...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, whereas, while, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1142.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23853211009 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87315546419 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564220183486 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.0813305697 43.030603864 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 190.333333333 112.824112599 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.3333333333 22.9334400587 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118445813084 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714988001773 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688072437577 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0959165503578 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0738496109662 0.0819641961636 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.4 13.2329268293 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.86 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.