Among the two line graphs, the first one illustrates the portion of electrical gadgets that people have their own and the second describes the time utilized by those devices to do household work from the year 1920 to 2019.
Overall, what stands out from the first graph is that from the early of the period there was a rapid increase of ownership of refrigerator and vacuum cleaner, while a gradual up and down was seen in the case of washing machines. With the spending of time, the usage of time climbed down exponentially.
To begin with the first picture, in 1920 the percentage of refrigerators as their own property was almost zero, whereas 30 and 40 percent people had their own washing machine and vacuum cleaner. After 20 years the amount of refrigerators went up from 0 to 55%, on the other hand, only 20 percent increase for both former and latter devices. In 1960 the percentage of refrigerators crossed the other two but both stuck on the same amount which was 70%. Then after 1980 and 2000, all people had their own refrigerator and vacuum cleaner respectively. In 2019 almost 75 percent of people had a washing machine.
In 1920 people used 50 hours per week of these machines to do their daily work, while in the next 40 years the usage time decreased in the same ratio which was 15 hours. After that, it gradually decreased and ended within 10 hours.
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 73
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that the range of technology currently available is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people Others think that it is causing the opposite effect Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The table below describes percentages of homeschooled students in Some Country in 1999 2004 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown 73
- In some cultures the old age is highly valued while in some cultures youth is highly valued Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, then, whereas, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1140.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69135802469 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49064703726 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543209876543 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0262041399 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0963973530542 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0410303770742 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435573608481 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0718572711014 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477210194452 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.