The bar chart below shows the sector contributions to India’s gross domestic product from 1960 to 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart represents a differentiation of three particular sectors which contributed to India’s gross domestic product the year between 1960 and 2000.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that the contribution of the agricultural sector to the GDP climbed down over periods, while the opposite trend was observed in the case of services.
To begin with, in 1960, harvesting was the biggest sector of India’s GDP which came up with 63% of total GDP, and the rest of providing by the other two sectors which were 37%. In the following decade, the contribution of agriculture began to decrease and came to approximately 54%, on the other hand, industry, and services started to rise and reached 21 and 23% respectively.
In the next two decades, agriculture drifted to 31 percent, while services went over 40%. Though first three decades, 1960 to 1980, the industrial sector contribution increased gradually to 25%, in 1990, it decreased slightly to 23%. In the final year, services had the same value as agriculture had at the beginning, and agriculture contributed 15% which was the lowest among the features.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-08 | Vuthungan | 86 | view |
| 2023-11-27 | ililmaidatuz | 84 | view |
| 2022-03-10 | Reven Fernando | view | |
| 2022-02-23 | Reven Fernando | 100 | view |
- The charts below show the growth in the population in some of the world s largest cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 31
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely discuss both these views and give 89
- The charts give information about world forests in five different regions 56
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of the electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 73
- The illustrations shows how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12432432432 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92643676512 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605405405405 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4442762047 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.428571429 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181452515065 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090260136843 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107690398086 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137941136908 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118596906621 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.