The charts below show the comparison of some kinds of energy production of France in 2 years.
The pie chart illustrates the percentage of five kinds of energy production of France in 1995 and 2005.
In general, it can be seen that the proportion of Petro production decreased, the opposite was true for other categories. Besides, the figure for coal was the highest during the period.
To begin with, in 1995, the primary sources in France were coal and gas, which together made up over half the production of energy, at 29.80% and 29.63% respectively. After 10 years, the percentages of energy produced for coal and gas rose slightly to 30.93% and 30.31% respectively. By contract, the figure for Petro saw a reversed pattern in which it dropped from 29.27% in 1995 to just 19.55% in 2005.
Moving on with regard to the other sources generated, 2005 witnessed a gradual growth in the figure for nuclear of 3.6% from 6.4% in 1995. Also, starting at 4.9% in 1995, the share of other energy production climbed minimally to 10.10% in 2005. However, their contributions to energy production in France were still smallest.
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee. 56
- The chart below show the type of transports young people in four countries prefer to use Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The charts below show the comparison of some kinds of energy production of France in 2 years 61
- Some people think that it is better for students to learn local history than world history.Do you agree or disagree? 60
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon A new supermarket S is planned for the town The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket 57
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 55, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
... in 1995, the primary sources in France were coal and gas, which together made up ov...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, so, still, in general, to begin with, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 865.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97126436782 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65221634721 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580459770115 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4921474995 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1111111111 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165223402364 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831549828863 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0999386181617 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134624553609 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110448811658 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.