The pie charts well compare how undergraduate majors were distributed by students' favor at the National University in the years 1990, 2000, 2010. It can be clearly seen from the graphs that computer science were dominated in the interested list of degrees, while Law was the least impression field of study.
In all three years, computer science achieved the first place in the amount of students who granted their degrees, with an incredible growth apply for each unique year, which respectively were 30% at the starting point (1990), 40% in the next decade and 45% in the year of 2010. In contrast, the percentage of students who were keen on taking a business related degree reduced yearly. It began with 30% in 1990, then went down to 20% in 2000 and ended up at 15% in the final year.
Meanwhile, the percentage of degrees in Law and Medicine had a similar vein. For Medicine, it had a good initiation (25% in 1999), then rose to 30% in 2000 before came back to the starting position in the end. For Law, started with 15% in 1990 and fell 5% down in 2000 and finally remained unchanged in 2010.
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- the chart below gives information on the percentage of british people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graph below shows the percentage of urban/suburban and rural households in a European country that had Internet access between 2008 and 2013.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 78
- The tables and pie chart show in percentage terms of the results of a survey of a new shopping complex in Auckland, New Zealand. 83
- The graph below shows the number of passenger railway journeys made in Great Britain between 1950 and 2004 5 86
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, then, well, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57142857143 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43118535371 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617346938776 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6992462264 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197580612792 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854950043651 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696250465288 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132258736072 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383329575321 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.