The charts below show degrees granted in different fields at the national university in the years 1990,2000,and 2010.
The pie chart below compares the number of diplomas, which were issued at the National University in 1990, 2000 and 2010 in depending on the major.
Overall, it is clear from the graph that the most of the specialists were graduated from the computer science departure and the least of them from the low one in the every considering year.
According to the chart, the popularity of the computer science was increasing gradually from a third in 1990 and 40% in 2000 to 45% from all number of students in the final 2010 year. We also can see the opposite situation referring to the business where this figure experienced a fall from the same 30% and a fifth in 2000 and finished with 15% in 2010.
As far as the medicine and the low concerned, these sectors started and finished with the same figures, it is 25 and 15% respectively for both 1990 and 2010 years and with only change in 30% and 10% in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-08 | Valeria Surkina | 78 | view |
- Ielts writing task 1 The two maps below show an island before and after construction of tourist facilities 56
- Films and games can be accessed at any time from mobile devices, the smart phones, tablets and laptop computers. Do the advantages of such developments outweigh the disadvantades? 89
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Ielts writing task 1 The two maps below show an island before and after construction of tourist facilities 78
- Due to transporting goods and people pollution increase Some people think that government should solve this issue when other think that this is individual responsibility 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
The pie chart below compares the number of diplomas, ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... with the same figures, it is 25 and 15% respectively for both 1990 and 2010 year...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 751.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52409638554 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43794369471 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566265060241 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 213.3 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 20.3036942451 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 150.2 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.2 22.9334400587 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24016731897 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138510566423 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109065285061 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155221221256 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113698974759 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.36 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.53 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.