The charts below show how the consumption of various food groups by people in the UK, 1942 - 2004 / 5. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two line charts compare and contrast data on the changes in consumption levels of various types of milk, fresh fruit and vegetables over a 64-year period from 1942 to 2005.
In general, while the rate of most milk categories decreased, the figures for fresh fruit and fruit juice rose over this time period.
More specifically, despite showing a fall in the amount of litres drunk per week from just over 2 litres in 1942 to exactly 2 litres in 2005, the consumption of total milk and cream was invariably higher than the other milk. Similarly, the number of grams of fresh vegetables eaten per week fell from 900 grams to a little over 700 grams before the consumption of fresh fruit surpassed it at the beginning of the 21st century. Although the drinking of skimmed milk started in 1975 with slightly more than 0 litres, by the mid-1990s, it was already the second most popular type of milk, with more than 1 litre per week being drunk per individual.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-01 | roadtoapro | 11 | view |
| 2023-07-01 | roadtoapro | 61 | view |
- The chart below show the amount of area used for growing fruit between 1993 and 2006 in Washington State USA Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g Dinosaur dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 89
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007 67
- The diagram below shows the amount of pork and chicken consumed in the US between 1960 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, similarly, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 795.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67647058824 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4249353432 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576470588235 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.1819227894 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.0 112.824112599 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.0 22.9334400587 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0569313576174 0.215688989381 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0354670713476 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388827388742 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0457138311125 0.15604864568 29% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418484029654 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.35 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.46 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.