The provided graphical representations demonstrate the average years of schooling, number of people as technicians and scientists and alloted funds on research and development in developing and developed nations during 1980 and 1990.
It is ostensible from the graph that average years of schooling in the case of developed countries was 2.5 years in 1980 but after 10 years , it was increased by 1 year. As far as industrialised nations were concerned , years of schooling on an average in 1980 was 8.5. Moving toward the second graph , count of scientist and technicians in 1980 in developing countries was roughly 10 per 1000 people and it climbed up 1990 to 15 per 1000 people. On a contrast , the number of scientist and technicians in developed nation in the former year accounted 40 per thousand people but after a decade , it became twice the previous year.
Moving towards the allotted funds , it was seen that 50 billion American dollars were spent research and development in developing countries during 1980 but it was halved in next 10 years . Moving futher,
in developed and industrialised nation during 1980, allocation of funds on research and development purposes was approximately 150 billion dollars. It was interesting to note that it escalated to nearly 350 million dollars which was twice the previous time period.
Overall , industrial countries were really far ahead as compared to developing Nations in every aspect in given time frames.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: Charos
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 140, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...was 2.5 years in 1980 but after 10 years , it was increased by 1 year. As far as i...
^^
Line 2, column 218, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...as industrialised nations were concerned , years of schooling on an average in 198...
^^
Line 2, column 301, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... was 8.5. Moving toward the second graph , count of scientist and technicians in 1...
^^
Line 2, column 461, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...990 to 15 per 1000 people. On a contrast , the number of scientist and technicians...
^^
Line 2, column 594, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...0 per thousand people but after a decade , it became twice the previous year. Mo...
^^
Line 3, column 34, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ear. Moving towards the allotted funds , it was seen that 50 billion American d...
^^
Line 3, column 53, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ds the allotted funds , it was seen that 50 billion American dollars were spent r...
^^
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... 1980 but it was halved in next 10 years . Moving futher, in developed and indus...
^^
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...halved in next 10 years . Moving futher, in developed and industrialised nation d...
^^^
Line 4, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ting to note that it escalated to nearly 350 million dollars which was twice the ...
^^
Line 5, column 9, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ice the previous time period. Overall , industrial countries were really far ah...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, really, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1224.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18644067797 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96974803412 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483050847458 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 352.8 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.4772675074 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.0 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186409885983 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10125426524 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582032140234 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121398449235 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286703068619 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.