The charts below show local government expenditure in 2010 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts illustrate the budget spending of the local government within five years (from 2010 to 2015) in terms of percentage.
Looking from all perspectives, it is readily apparent that a five-year period has made an obvious difference in government expenditure in various sectors. Regarding the most significant one, spending for education has a 3% lower after five years, from 24% in 2010 to 21% in 2015, whilst the defense sector has the same result, from 17% to 14% in 2015.
In contrast, the local government spends more on the development of welfare in 2015, with its figure rising from 8% to 13% in 2015. Likewise, the budget on interest on borrowing grew bigger since it doubles its percentage in 2010, covering 10% in the pie chart. The sectors that cover below 5% of the 2010 chart, such as culture and leisure and transport, witnessed lesser spending in 2015, with a mere percentage of 1.
To sum up, compared to 2010, the local government in 2015 seemed to invest more spending over education, and the defense sector, with its enlarging interest over developing welfare and paid lesser attention to entertainment-related sectors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 73
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, look, regarding, in contrast, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02617801047 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90760283004 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581151832461 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.183503401 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.142857143 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2857142857 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20162097533 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107308151451 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437565456195 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137427300519 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446173664879 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.