The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers. summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
These two charts below are showing the basic purpose of study based on age diversity and how much they will earn from the employers. Most of the young people spend their studies for chasing up their career instead of interest. It becomes inurement today that people are preferebly study for achieve a high career and it is also balanced by the employer support related to the fees.
The first chart emphasize a contrast number of person who goes study for career and interest. Since people are getting older, the reasons for study are also shifting. People under 26 mostly go study for their career until it reaches 80% of the total and the rest still stand with their interest. The data prove that as people grow older, they have tendency to satisfy their interest by facilitated with a suitable education. It can be seen clearly that the obvious movement happened when people getting older, they have a various goals for study.
The second chart is accentuate the employer support towards the trend that happen in the reasons why people go for study. The data strongly define that people under 26 gain a higher appreciation than the older one. It may occur due to the case in the first chart. The data also display a moderate drop of employer support by year to year depends on the age of the people. After the decreasing level of employer support between age 26 until 39, it starts climb marginally for the people over 49.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | happyhappy | 67 | view |
| 2018-09-08 | denissa | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 531, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'goal'?
Suggestion: goal
...ople getting older, they have a various goals for study. The second chart is acce...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 21, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'accentuated'.
Suggestion: accentuated
...oals for study. The second chart is accentuate the employer support towards the trend ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, second, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 5.60731707317 357% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1181.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70517928287 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21297437832 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541832669323 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 360.0 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.2103356625 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8461538462 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3076923077 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172342351566 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704414101057 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050451748167 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130542129416 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384936471155 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.