The charts compare the number of female students in comparison with their male peers in all three levels of education between developing and developed nations in two years 1990 and 2000.
It is clear that the biggest difference between two types of countries can be seen in tertiary sector. Moreover, developed countries' figures were closer to the 2005 targets than developing nations'.
In 1990, there were 83 girls in developing countries attended primary, while the number for developed countries was 93 students. As regard to secondary sector, while the figure for developing countries was 72 girl students, 98 female students in developed countries enrolled in secondary school. The developed countries' highschool figure were stood at 105 students, while only 66 of their peers in developing countries went to school.
In 2000, both figures in elementary sector witnessed rises, with 4 students in developing nations and 3 girls in developed nations. However, developing countries' secondary education had the most dramatic change, to 82 students in 2000, compared to a 7 students increase in the developed countries' tertiary education.
- The diagram below contain information regarding the percentage of people occupied in various type of position in 1999 and 2001 82
- IELTS Writing Task 1 - Example 9You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The chart shows British Emigration to selected destinations between 2004 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wh 78
- People who live in foreign countries should follow the traditions and customs. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 56
- Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Other believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- The government and individuals are spending too much money on national celebrations like new year or festivals Do you agree or disagree 91
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49152542373 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80759697699 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542372881356 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6091915723 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0717565305132 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398936896952 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458353170927 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0570233216543 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528984102159 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.