The line graph compares the weekly consumption of three different types of fast food in the UK between 1970 and 1990.
It is clear from the graph that the amount of Fish & Chips consumed per week experienced the most dramatic change during the research
period. Additionally, whilethe quantities of Hamburger and Fish & Chips eaten both rose significantly, there was a slight decrease in the figure for pizza.
In 1970, the amount of Pizza consumed was highest, at more than 300 grams, while the figure for Hamburger was significantly lower, at only around 30 grams. Meanwhile, approximately 80 grams of Fish & Chips were eaten by UK people. In 1985, Pizza consumption slightly fell and reached the lowest point of 200 grams, whereas the other two figures gradually went up.
In 1990, Fish & Chips weekly consumption increased dramatically to 500 grams and became the highest figure in the line graph, while Hamburger’s figure experienced a slight rise to about 300 grams. At the same time, the amount of Pizza eaten remained stable at roughly 200 grams.
- Some people think that in order to prevent illness and disease governments should make efforts in reducing environmental pollution and housing problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 83
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005 89
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. 67
- The diagram below contain information regarding the percentage of people occupied in various type of position in 1999 and 2001 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...most dramatic change during the research period. Additionally, whilethe quantitie...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 894.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13793103448 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7976625589 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603448275862 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4407010862 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.75 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219148744803 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108077077736 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141403527357 0.0843802449381 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157558665779 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.157320158792 0.0819641961636 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.